I blogged here and here regarding the recent case brought by author J.D. Salinger for copyright infringement against the writer, publisher and distributor of a sequel to "Catcher In The Rye" entitled "60 Years Later: Coming Through the Rye."

Although Mr. Salinger won in the district court when the Judge held Mr. Salinger was likely to succeed on a claim of copyright infringement, an appeal has since been filed along with “Friends of the Court” Amicus Briefs.

The Amicus Briefs filed by the American Library Association (here),

The New York Times Company (here), and

Public Citizen, Inc. (here), all argue to the court that the district court erred in its decision. 

The briefs are worth the read for the depth of case law cited. 

The primary focus of the briefs filed by the American Library Association and The New York Times Company is the concern that First Amendment rights of authors/creators/readers are being narrowed and that an unduly restrictive fair use standard was applied.

In comparison, the Public Citizen brief’s primary focus is the concern the district court extended copyright to “ideas” and has blurred the line between the idea/expression dichotomy.

Agree or disagree, this case is one to watch and to read the court filings. 

I posted here on June 5 that author J.D. Salinger filed a lawsuit seeking damages for copyright infringement and an injunction against the writer, publisher and distributor of a sequel to "Catcher In The Rye" .... "60 Years Later: Coming Through the Rye."

On July 1, 2009, U.S. District Court judge Deborah Batts issued a preliminary injunction barring the defendant from manufacturing, publishing, distributing, shipping, advertising, promoting, selling or otherwise disseminating “60 Years Later, “  the unauthorized sequel to J.D. Salinger’s novel, “Catcher in the Rye” in the United States.  Her opinion is posted here.

The Judge held Mr. Salinger was likely to succeed on a claim of copyright infringement after weighing, in detail, the factors for a fair use defense.

In a 37 page decision, the Judge first determined Mr. Salinger held a valid copyright for the “Catcher” and moved to a discussion of the fair use defense (17 USC Sec. 107).  The decision is a great resource for the history and line of cases related to fair use.More...

Author J.D. Salinger, at 90 years-old, filed a lawsuit this week  seeking damages for copyright infringement and an injunction against the writer, publishers and distributor of a sequel to "Catcher In The Rye" .... "60 Years Later: Coming Through the Rye."

A character very much like an aged Holden Caulfield,  at 76 years old, an escapee from a retirement home and identified as ``Mr. C" takes on New York, like the young Holden in "Catcher In The Rye."  J.D. California, the author of the sequel never refers to the character as Holden Caulfield, only as "Mr. C." 

The complaint asserts the sequel infringes Salinger's copyright rights in both his novel and the character Holden Caufield.  The sequel and the original both begin with Holden leaving an institution and end with he and his sister at the carousel in Central Park.   The complaint goes on to allege the bulk of the book has Holden doing, seeing and talking to the same folks as in the original while he is in New York.

The sequel is currently available for purchase in the UK and is scheduled for a Fall 2009 release in the US.

Can J.D. California successfully defend an action for copyright infringement?  The Wall Street Journal blog has a great outline of the defense here.  I struggle with the thought that this sequel could be fair use.  It is really going to hinge on whether or not this new work is transformative of the original.  I posted earlier this year on the status of fair use and transformation in the Shepard Fairy case.